Thoughts too long to Tweet

Although the Constitution permits communities to enact most laws they believe to be desirable, it requires that there be at least a legitimate reason for the passage of a law that treats different classes of people differently. There was no such reason that Proposition 8 could have been enacted. Because under California statutory law, same-sex couples had all the rights of opposite-sex couples, regardless of their marital status, all parties agree that Proposition 8 had one effect only. It stripped same-sex couples of the ability they previously possessed to obtain from the State, or any other authorized party, an important right—the right to obtain and use the designation of ‘marriage’ to describe their relationships. Nothing more, nothing less.

The decision. (via yodelmachine

)

Via announcing, today, an internet
  1. beksly reblogged this from tj
  2. smacdona reblogged this from tj
  3. tj reblogged this from yodelmachine
  4. tj said: It is so ordered!
  5. vsc reblogged this from sblaufuss
  6. sblaufuss reblogged this from yodelmachine
  7. tymethiefslongerthoughts reblogged this from yodelmachine
To Tumblr, Love PixelUnion

We're updating Fluid!

Soon, we'll be updating the look and feel of this theme. Read about the changes here. You can easily turn off this notification in the theme customization panel.

Close